WHITECROW BORDERLAND

 

Creationism Versus Creativity.  (12/31/2004)

 

The first five words of the Bible, “In the beginning, God created . . .,” are a seemingly innocuous way to start an extended discussion of the relationship between (wo)man and God.  That “harmless” statement; however, is followed by an unrelenting effort on the part of the people who wrote it to convince everyone who reads it that compliance with its dictates is not up to any individual’s choice.  There is no freedom here in spite of the fact that Christians everywhere and everywhen have always insisted on freedom of choice.  Sure freedom to disobey God’s commandments exists but at the cost of eternal damnation for anyone who so chooses.  Going beyond the Bible’s initial delusion, which states that the only human life worthy of existence is lived by people who do not question the validity of the first five words of the Bible, can be done only by denying the truth and validity of the Book’s first five words which are always already perceived as being absolutely true.  In other words, if you are not a creationist, a person who believes unequivocally that God created the universe in six days, between April 6 and April 11, 5004 BC say (which are just as factual and non-arbitrary as any other dates suggested for the event), then the rest of the Bible was written for the sole purpose of condemning you to everlasting torment in oceans and lakes of burning fire.  That, admittedly, is an exaggeration.  There are many other things in the Bible.  For instance, a significant effort was made throughout subsequent passages in the text of many books to excuse the practice of genocide that believers claim as their God-given right to practice against non-believers.  In fact, the first five words of the Bible create the philosophical and quasi-moral ground to justify exactly that.  Anyone who says that God created anything automatically and without reservation ascribes to the notion of hierarchical structure as a ruling principle of universal reality.

 

This is true because God as Creator is all-powerful, in a class by Himself, so to speak, that excludes every other thing and creature on the face of anything that has one.  Since God is all-powerful, everything else must naturally and inevitably be less than that.  Everything He created is less than God and must be below Him.  On the one side, you have HIGH; while, on the other, you have low.  The only thing the existence of God necessitates unequivocally is the existence of hierarchical structure based on human generated scales of high and low, good and evil, same and other, this and that, now and then, here and there, and so on, ad infinitum.  The problem, simply put, is that no such structure, or structures, exists naturally anywhere on the face of anything that has one.  There is no such thing as hierarchy.  Nothing is higher or lower than anything else.  Why creationism matters so much to the people who embrace the notion is that without it they cannot claim to be in a position higher than ordinary individuals, in a position, in other words, that gives them the unique ability to judge what is high and low, good and evil, and so on, ad infinitum.  After seizing the “high” ground, of course, they are quick to manufacture and fabricate justifications for destroying that which they find beneath them, and thereby in conflict with the false moral codes their delusions demand and inflict on the rest of us.  

 

A member of the American Taliban, one who certainly embraces the idea that God created the world, has recently informed members of the US Senate who represent states that favored Bush in 2004 that they will become targets (or as he put it “will be in the ‘bull’s eye’ the next time they seek re-election”).  James Dobson, founder of Focus on the Family, cannot resist the most extreme expression of the threat he can use to intimidate people who oppose his narrow view of reality.  His point here concerns anyone, even including Bush himself, who opposes only the most conservative appointments to the Federal Judiciary, especially appointments to the Supreme Court.  If appointees do not pass his requirements for religious fundamentalism, he will target Bush for whatever smear campaign his money can buy.  Any Senator who opposes the nomination of a religious fanatic to the bench can expect a re-election campaign like the ones his money-driven ideology supported against people he considered too liberal in 2004.  Tom Daschle was one such victim of Dobson’s ‘bull’s eye’ mentality.  The idea that any single individual, no matter what his political philosophy, has the right and duty to impose his point-of-view on the rest of the country makes a total mockery of our democratic institutions.  This is especially true when the campaign designed to eliminate a congressional representative is not bound by anything like truth-telling in efforts used to characterize the person Dobson has targeted—any lie, exaggeration, misrepresentation is permissible if the ultimate objective is achieved.

 

This mentality, ever more pervasive in our society, intends to eliminate choice and diversity in our culture.  Its purpose, its hope, is to discredit and destroy any and every point-of-view that is not identical to the so-called value system embraced by its practitioners.  Dobson wants every voice in America to be his voice.  His aim is a totalitarian regime that permits no dissenting opinion whatsoever to challenge the narrow limits of his personal perception of reality.  He wants inquisition, not justice.  He wants Christian privilege for the few, for the “elect,” not equality for every citizen of our nation.  He intends to institutionalize his bigotry in the Federal Judiciary so there will be no recourse, legal or otherwise, to the destruction of civil liberties his view of social reality entails.  That he uses militaristic rhetoric to express his plans suggests that he may not stop short of actual assassination to achieve his goals.  If the votes are not there, how long will it be before he, and his followers, resort to bullets?  A ‘bulls eye’, after all, is the object at which one aims his gun.  He can find any number of people in his ranks willing to pull the trigger.

 

Two principles matter here when this purely Eurocentric ideology is contrasted to native American belief systems.  Firstly, there is no such thing as a concept of hierarchy in our traditional thought processes and behavioral patterns.  We see nothing in terms of high and low, same and other, this and that.  Concepts based on binary opposition are meaningless in the way we perceive reality.  No one is ever privileged above anyone else for any reason whatsoever.  Such concepts are literally impossible.  The second principle explains why this is true.  Over the course of living in the natural world for the past 40,000 years or so, native Americans learned through careful and prolonged observation that the basic structure of the universe (we limited our observational practice to what we could actually see—sun, moon, planets, stars) was, is, and always will be essentially harmonic.  Harmony is an unrelenting “master,” so to speak, that does not allow for the existence of binary oppositions, dialectical conflicts, or differential contentions anywhere or anywhen in the vast realm of its reach.  (I have described precisely what I mean here in other sections of this document; notably: Maya Calendrical Harmonics and Maya Geometrical Harmonics).  The simple fact that harmony rules the relationships apparent in material reality, while something “Christians” would point to as justification for condemnation, make it impossible for native Americans to embrace the notion that a Supreme Being had any hand whatsoever in making the world what is so decidedly is.  The very existence of that Supreme Being demands an absence of harmony because He must necessarily reduce everything else in his created world to a position below His supremacy.  Put simply: the harmony that exists in every reach of the universe necessarily denies the existence of something, or anything, that could have created it—unless that thing is less than supreme—an idea, or possibility, odious to Christian theology.  We have no problem with any of this because our creator spirits (mother earth; father sky) are superior to nothing at all.

 

Furthermore, the fact that all reality was created by a single mother and a single father makes everything in the universe equal to everything else that can be found there.  Every living thing is either my brother or my sister since all of us have only one mother and one father.  No hierarchy can exist in such a world.  Oddly, or not, it is the existence of the harmony that created the ground in the universe for the existence of the spirit world in the first place.  Spirit, as native Americans understand and practice it, is a natural result of the harmonic principles that guide and control the complex interactions apparent and observable between and among all objects of material reality.  Matter gives rise to spirit just as spirit gives rise to matter.  They are inseparable.  They are interchangeable.  They are certainly not the same thing however.  To see the “difference,” simply look at the reflection of any physical object in a mirror.  The material object is just that—its mirror image, its reflection, is the thing’s spirit.  This is a temporal concept in native American philosophy, one I may examine in this series of thoughts later.

 

A concluding (post)script here: since our creator spirits are not all-powerful, and have never pretended to be, they have always required help in fashioning the world and maintaining its essential balance, its harmony.  That task was given to us.  We have always understood our place in the creation of the world as co-creators with mother earth and father sky.  We sing it into existence.  We have always done that.  If we stop—the world will die.  We do not intend to stop singing the world into existence.