COLOSSIANS


AUTHORSHIP

EXTERNAL EVIDENCE

The external evidences for the Pauline authorship of the Epistle are abundant. In the second century many church fathers had quoted part of this Epistle in their writings, e.g. Irenaeus, Clement of Alexandria, Tertullian, Origen. In addition, possible allusions to the Epistle are traceable in other primitive writers, e.g. Ignatius used the precise Greek of Col. 1:23 "settled in the faith"; Theophilus, of Antioch, in his apologetic work used the words of Col. 1:15 "Firstborn of all creation".

INTERNAL EVIDENCE

Until the last century, no serious question about Pauline authorship seems to have raised. The Epistle claims to be written by Paul in the opening (1:1). Obviously, Colossians are closely related to the widely accepted genius epistle Philemon. In both letters, greeting are send from Aristarchus, Mark, Epaphras, Luke, and Demas who were with Paul when he wrote (4:10-14; Philem. 23-24). However, modern scholars has widely disputed on the Pauline authorship. Their arguments are mainly based on three issues : language and style, theology, as well as similarity to Ephesians.

  1. Language and style : In this Epistle, Paul used many new vocabularies which did not appear in other accepted genius Pauline letters. This may be accounted by the need of opposing the new heresy.
  2. Theology : Firstly, the heresy in the Epistle is Gnosticism appeared in second century. Nevertheless, we know that although Gnosticism appeared maturely in the second century, it did appear earlier in a less systematic form. Secondly, the important motifs in Pauline theology such as justify by faith, law and grace, righteousness is not there. However, we must bear in mind that this is a real letter but not a theological handbook. Paul only wrote necessary contents responded to the real situation. There was no need to repeat every Pauline's motifs in order to prove that it is a genuine Pauline letter.
  3. Similarity to Ephesians : Some scholars argued that one will not write two letters that are so similar, therefore one of them must be the imitation of the other. On the contrary, the similarity can prove that these two were produced by the same author who is dealing with two different, but not unconnected sets of correspondents about the same time, and writing at once with a remembrance of their differences and with a mind preoccupied with one great department of Divine truth.

PROVENANCE AND DATE

The date of writing of this Epistle depended on where Paul wrote it. Paul wrote this Epistle in prison (4:3, 10, 18). There are three possibilities, i.e., Caesarea, Ephesus and Rome. Moreover, Philemon and Colossians were written nearly the same time.

  1. Caesarea : Caesarea is impossible since it is hard to reason a runaway slave Onesimus would flee to that city. In addition, Paul had little hope of release at that period; what he hoped for was appealing to Caesar.
  2. Ephesus : Ephesus is a more reasonable possibility. It is near Colossae, so it is possible for Onesimus to flee there. Besides, Paul requested Philemon to prepare a guest room for him. There is no point for that if he was in Rome (which is far away from Ephesus). However, Luke and Mark were mentioned as being with Paul when he wrote, but Acts did not include the Ephesians ministry among the "we" sections, and most importantly, Mark was not with Paul on the second missionary journey (Acts 15:35-41).
  3. Rome : Then we leave only Rome. Though we know that Paul planned to go to Spain (Rom. 15:28), not Colossae after visiting Jerusalem, he might change his mind after he wrote Roman. In addition, Luke was with Paul in Rome (Acts 28:14; 2 Tim 4:11) and apparently Aristarchus also (Acts 27:2). Onesimus would flee to such metropolis in order to lose himself in the crowds. We know that Paul had more freedom to evangelize in Rome than in other cities. Therefore Rome seems to be where the Epistle was written. So the authoring date would be early 60s.

OCCASION

Paul had not been to Colossae before. The church was most probably found by one of the fruit of Paul's two years ministry in Ephesus, i.e. Epaphras. Colossae is a town on the bank of the river Lycus in south-east Asia Minor. It was neither a large nor important town, though it had formerly been both. The apostle had heard from Epaphras that some false teachers had come to this young church, so he wrote to refute their errors. The false teaching in Colossae are not precisely clear, though some scholars proposed the false teaching were uniquely Jewish. Evidently, it was a kind of syncretistic religion product. It was a blend of Jewish and Hellenistic teachings. Lightfoot further proposed this heresy was akin to the teaching of the Essenes. It was an embryo of the type of speculative thought which so much disturbed the Church of the second century, and was known as Gnosticism.

FALSE TEACHING IN COLOSSAE AND PAUL'S REFUTATION

The heresy promoted a form of dualism. It embedded asceticism, Judaism as well as Oriental Mysticism(2:20-23). They claimed that God was apart from creation. The material realm was evil but spiritual realm was Good. God did not create this material world directly but through a lot of intermediate agents for example angles(cf. 1:16). Therefore they need to worship God through these intermediate agents (2:18a). Although they had Christ, but He was just the beginning of their faith(2:19). Then the best spiritual exercise was to ill-treat their physical body(2:23) since it was a prison of their inner soul. Besides, special spiritual knowledge(2:18b), circumcision(2:11) and Jewish rituals(2:16,21) was a must for their salvation.

Firstly, Paul raised high Christology to refute such dualism(1:15-21). He emphasized that the supremacy of Christ over both material and spiritual realms(1:15-19). All things were created by Him and for Him(1:16). There were not necessary through other intermediate agents to access to God. Through Christ's blood on the cross, they were already reconciled with God(1:20-22). Besides, they did not need any mysterious knowledge for salvation, because all the mystery of God had manifested in Christ(1:26-27; 2:2-3). Their spiritual growth were wholly depended on their walk in Christ (2:6-7) rather than following persuasive argument(2:4) or human tradition(2:8). This body was not the prison of soul and inherently evil, on contrary, Christ manifested all the fullness of Deity dwelling in bodily form (2:9). They no longer needed to follow Jewish cumcision, since they had experienced a new cumcision in baptism (2:11-12). Furthermore, the laws of Judaism had no effective on them, since Christ had canceled out all of them on the cross (2:13-15). Any angels worshipping or Jewish rituals were not only not appropriate but would defraud their prizes(2:16-20). So the true spirituality was seeking to live out the life of Christ in them(3:1-4). In practices, they had to put off the old self(3:5-9), which was every evil walks of life, and put on the new self, which was being renewed to a true knowledge according to the image of Christ(3:10). Love and thankfulness were the two main manifestations of this new life (3:11-17). Finally Paul directed the readers to live a submissive life in different positions(3:18-4:1), which also was one of the important fruit of true spiritual maturity.

OUTLINE

  1. Introduction (1:1-14)
    1. Greetings (1:1-2)
    2. Thanksgiving (1:3-8)
    3. Prayer (1:9-14)
  2. The Supremacy in Christ(1:15-22)
    1. Supremacy over Creation (1:15-19)
    2. Supremacy in reconciliation (1:20-22)
  3. Paul's Ministry for the Church (1:23-2:7)
    1. A Ministry of Suffering (1:23-24)
    2. A Ministry of Preaching (1:25-29)
    3. A Ministry of Prayer (2:1-5)
    4. A Ministry of Exhortation (2:6-7)
  4. Warning Against Error (2:8-23)
    1. The Error of False Philosophy (2:8-15)
    2. The Error of Legalism (2:16-17)
    3. The Error of Angel Worship (2:18-19)
    4. The Error of Asceticism (2:20-23)
  5. True Spirituality
    1. The Root Principle of the Christian Life (3:1-4)
    2. Old Self and New Self (3:5-17)
    3. Submissive Life (3:18-4:1)
    4. Call to Prayer (4:2-6)
  6. Final Greetings (4:7-18)

RELATION TO EPHESIANS

The parallel between Colossians and Ephesians are observed. Most topics mentioned in Ephesians recurs in Colossians in one or another way. But there has no trace of a systematic expansion of the longer Epistle from the shorter. Colossians' main theme is to refute the false teaching, so large portion of the epistle are on the controversial issue with Judaism and other philosophies. On the other hand, Ephesians supposed to be an circulating letter for edifying the churches in Ephesus distinct, so more positive doctrines especially on the doctrine of church are mentioned. Interestly, one important topic appearing in Colossians does not appear in Ephesians, that is the presentation of the Son of God as cause and head of the whole created universe. On the other hand, the work of Holy Spirit appearing prominently in Ephesians does not appear in Colossians. The word "spirit" (pneuma) occurs only twice in Colossians (1:8;2:5); and in 2:5 the reference is probably not to the Holy Spirit but to the human spirit.


PHILEMON


AUTHORSHIP AND DATING

There had never been serious doubts that this letter are not a genuine writing of the apostle Paul. It is a private letter Paul wrote to Philemon, Apphia, Archippus and the church in their house (1-2). The date of authoring heavily depends on where Paul wrote this Epistle. Please refer to the part of Colossians.

OCCASION

Onesimus is a slave of Philemon, he probable ran away from Philemon and met Paul in the prison. As the case of Colossians, some suggested that Onesimus ran to either Ephesus or Rome. While he was in prison, he was converted by Paul. Now, Paul sent him back to Philemon and wrote this letter in order to ask Philemon to receive him as brother and did not punish him.

OUTLINE

  1. Opening greetings (1-3)
  2. Thanksgiving an prayer (4-7)
  3. The request (8-22)
    1. Onesimus and Paul (8-16)
    2. Onesimus and Philemon (17-22)
  4. Closing Greetings (23-25)

CONTRIBUTION

This is one private correspondence Paul left behind. Through this we can has a look on Paul's characters. His love, wisdom, humor, gentleness, tact and above all Christian and human maturity demonstrated in his daily life. Slave problem were serious in ancient Rome, although this Epistle not directly touched the topic, it give us direction to due slaves with love and teach us that in Christ we are one family. In addition, this epistle showed us how the earthly relationships were transformed by the theology behind.

Back to Caleb's Home