|
Unfortunately the term ritual has been used (and often) abused ad infinitum. it has become a standing joke amongst archaeology students, that one only has to attribute any evidence which is not readily understood to ritual activity. For clarity's sake: this is how the author understands and uses the term ritual:
ritual is an activity which is carried out according to a set pattern
ritual includes spiritual, religious and pseudo-religious behaviour
people can have personal rituals:, e.g. always having a cup of coffee before breakfast, etc.
graduation ceremonies, the state opening of parliament, etc are examples of modern rituals.
It follows from this definition, that there are rituals within any society. From an archaeological point of view it is, however, nearly always impossible to elucidate the nature of these rituals. Many may not leave any evidence to be found beyond the structures in which they took place. Many more may not even have taken place within structures, or have required any artefacts in their conduct. As an analogy, imagine a visitor from Mars looking at European cathedrals. Our hypothetical alien might realise, that these buildings have a special, non-functional significance. He might even understand that churches, whilst smaller play a similar role. But, this would not mean that he has grasped the principles of Christianity. In other words: the alien would recognise that a ritual is taking place, but would not understand the nature or purpose of the ritual. In many ways, the archaeologist faced with prehistoric ritual is in the position of that alien.
|
|