Weather the last two years has been near perfect: 40s, overcast, light
or no
wind. I've worn a singlet (gloves last year, I think) and started out
both
times wearing a big garbage bag for the first mile until I warmed up.
Course is flat and fast; only one modest hill that bears mentioning
(somewhere
near 10, I think, going into the park) and a few other short rises.
Only real problem is near absence of spectators. If you're self motivated,
Philly is a great qualifier for a fast time. If you enjoy hearing people
cheer
you on, you will not be a happy camper. The last 12 miles are particularly
lonely; you pass by the finish at mile 14 and go 6 miles up the river
to a
small town, turn around, and run back on the other side of the same
road (Kelly
Drive, I think). Except for the town at the turnaround--where there
are some
crowds--these last 12 miles are pretty quiet, albeit scenic.
Organization is very good (accurate mile markers, frequent water and
sports
drinks, energy gel at about 18-20, plenty of volunteers, good post-finish
tent
with food/drink/blankets), the expo the day before is excellent (big,
and some
real deals in running gear), and the pasta party is quite good. And
the
size--3,000 runners, I believe--makes for company at every stage of
the race
without being too big. Overall, the only thing this race needs to make
it
really great is a few tens of thousands of spectators lining
the course. I
think the lateness of the season and the cool weather put a clamp on
things
because even the stretches through the city are pretty empty.
A small group from our Northern New Jersey club will probably be running
it
this year so I hope the above description holds true again. I'll probably
give
it a go.
Chip Bearden
They fly 800 miles to visit and then watch TV or read the newspaper
(before me
I might add !) for most of the visit. Maybe while they are parked
in front of
the TV I should start pounding down beers and acting real stupid.
That might
change their thinking - NOT. Better yet, maybe I should disconnect
the cable
TV hookup and cancel the paper.
During their last visit, I took my six year old out to the track with
me. My
hope being they would think what a good dad I was including my son
in some of
my training activities. When I returned, all I heard was "how
dangerous it
was to be running around the track leaving THEIR grandson to play in
the
center football field". Explaining that he was in sight the entire
time and I
was never more than a 100 yards away did no good. But there was a glimmer
of
hope - my son proceeded to tell me that I run all wrong. "Dad, you
run too
slow and should run fast like me." Now he wants to be my coach
everytime I
hit the track and that is GREAT.
' Just blowing off steam here but if any of you have ideas on how to
handle
in-laws let me know. Maybe I'll leave printed copies of the better
suggestions laying around the house for all to see.
Tim
tim@systec.com
As a result, my orthopaedist has told me not to jog. In fact he was
of the
opinion that jogging is harmful for anyone's back, least of all those
with
spina bifida. What are the opinions of experienced joggers on this?
Accg to my
doctor, walking briskly and running are fine but jogging is a strict
no-no.
Also, what are the energy range and conditioning effects of spot jogging
-
jogging on one's toes at the same place?
Thanks. Sam.
--
Sameer Anand Siruguri Graduate student, CS, Rice University
siruguri@cs.rice.edu (No web page yet)
Res: (713)-630-9243 Off:(713)-527-8101 x2282
6500, S. Main, #332, Houston, TX 77030
Saturday, 03 October 1998, 10am
Camp Fortune, Old Chelsea, Quebec
The race starts at the Fortune Chalet and meanders gradually onto a
panoramic ridge overlooking the Valley before descending rugged single
track trails into mature forests, through exotic microclimates, around
ponds, an occasional deer, past refreshing waterfalls and over nearly
forgotten Algonquin pathways.
Embark upon a surreal multi-terrain experience; varying paradoxically
from
exposed routes over alpine meadows, celestial climbs onto rocky outcrops
swept with clouds. Vistas offer spectacular views of fall colours,
to
radical technical descents off the roots of the ancient Laurentian
mountains.
Finish back where you have started. Well marked and worn trails. COST
$5
(Money will be used to support Amateur Sport).
http://magi.com/~vo2max/mtnrun.htm
The problem may not be that you aren't drinking enough, but rather that
you aren't absorbing what you do drink. Electrolytes will help you
absorb the water you do take in. I highly recommend that anyone who
is
doing runs of 2 hours or more, particularly in hot weather, consider
some form of electrolyte replacement. As an ultra runner, I've had
great
results with SUCCEED! caps, a buffered salt/potassium capsule taken
every hour or so depending on conditions. For complete information
see
the website at:
http://www.fred.net/ultrunr/!caps.html
--
Anti-Spam Alert: If you wish to reply, cut the *BS*
Trails of The Diablo Valley
*Running - Hiking - Nature*
http://come.to/diablo-valley-trails
Since that time, I recently read a book called "Training for Speed and
Endurance" written by a team of Australians that basically said the
same thing (the max is even lower for swimming).
My own heart rate monitor seems to confirm the information in these
articles. I am 30 years old with a heart rate max of 210 (I know
this
sounds high, but I was pretty scientific about measuring it on a
treadmill until I thought I was going to explode). My resting
pulse
rate is 52 and I weigh 155 lbs.
During hard interval sessions on a track running, I regularly get my
heart rate into the 200-205 range (sometimes a tad higher if it's an
all-out sprint). During 5K races and tempo runs the range
seems to
be between 180-195 depending on the terrain.
During hard Spinning (yes, the spin classes) sessions, the same
perceived effort for my track workouts, yields measurements in the
190-195 range. The absolute highest I have ever acheived on a
bike
(or spinner) is 199.
Does anybody else have anything to say about the cycling heart rate
max being lower than the running max? At first, it seemed intuitively
wrong - a "max" is a "max." The more I read and play with my
Polar
monitor, the more I'm inclined to agree with the "experts".
Joe D.
Joe's Running Links
http://joedom.home.mindspring.com
(301) 570-6887
Thanks,
greg nelson
Terry R. McConnell Mathematics/304B Carnegie/Syracuse, N.Y.
13244-1150
mcconnel@servtech.com
http://barnyard.syr.edu/~tmc