twelve scientists who, in the last two thousand five hundred years changed the world both as we perceive it and as we live in it p.1
individual can typify as well as exemplify a sudden breakthrough in thought p.1
single figure can allow the context to be brought to bear p.1
Faraday apparently stumbling into science p.2
heroic Marie Curie with little but the determination and brilliance p.2
Newton a force of invention all subsequent scientists look on with awe p.2
Galileo successful bringer of new worlds and unsuccessful intriguer in old onesp.2
thought of by some to be the first mathematician and physicist, Archimedes p.2
makers of discoveries which changed the world
involvements of scientists who are alive now is fundamental p.3
get to the heart of Darwins achievement rapidly, accurately and reliably p.3
described surely and succinctly
comment on the context
bring Darwin and his ideas into the 1990s and show how they have developed and been developed since Darwins day p.3
asking simple but central questions, the essentials are described and the main points made
contributors carry such authority p.3
learning about science, for me, had the effect of transforming the world p.6
seeks to reach out to the deep past of science and also pin it to the present day p.8
giants are as clear as pylons supported by them are many current scientists supported by them is the non-scientist p.9
I have only seen so far because I have been standing on the shoulders of other giants Newton p.13
if the discovery of science had not happened in Greece, would it not have happened at all?
I believe so Lewis Wolpert p.16
Look, without Archimedes I could have achieved nothing Wolpert on Galileo p.23
there are thing changing in science and that is the essence, that things can change I tis painful, but you have got to change; but some of the key ideas remain for ever Wolpert p.32
someone like Faraday or Darwin, they change the way we think about the world and you can either do this is dribs and drabs or someone could have this astonishing insight Wolpert p.33
Invention of telescope by Hans Lippershay ? Galileo, 46, improved instrument and turned to stars ? discovers satellite of Jupiter p.57
Principia Mathematica perhaps the single most important book in the history of science p.85
If I have seen further it is by standing on the shoulders of giants Newton p.95
science has evolved and still does we only see in retrospect the ideas that proved fruitful Sir Martin Rees p.96
He drew the distinction between elements and compounds, so that people understood the way that the world was built much more clearly Peter Atkins p.107
overturned the theory of phlogiston p.108
really the executioner of alchemy Atkins p.110
properly regarded as the father of chemistry Atkins p.111
Oxygen gas, according to Lavoisier, is a compound of two elements oxygen, which is the principle of acidity, and caloric, which is the principle of heat Simon Schaffer p.114
the one who named oxygen, but he was not its discoverer. Lavoisier discovered nothing, in fact, in chemistry (contrary to popular opinion) Bernadette Bensaude-Vincent p.115
he was undoubtedly a revolutionary scientist p.119
The revolution does not need scientists a judge p.121
his death is still a matter of great embarrassment to the French p.121
only two years after his execution Lavoisier became a hero p.122
it is very rewarding to see the evolution of ideas that has gone on then watch later on their final flowering Atkins p.123
theoretical work radically challenged the ideas of physicists who preceded him p.130
sudden shifting of the perspective of knowledge that is so thrilling in science p.130
a man who radically changed a way of looking at the world p.130
man who changed the world p.130
book binder, left school at 13 ? given tickets to listen to Sir Humphry Davy ? wrote up the lectures, bound them and sent them to Davy - John Meurig Thomas p.131
first to show that a magnetic field could produce a current most science dictionaries credit him with the invention of a primitice electric motor p.134
the word scientist was not coined until the 1830s p.136
magnitude of his discoveries Thomas p.139
he liquified aout twenty different gases. Referigeration becomes possible as a result Thomas p.139
his laws of electrolysis changed the nature of industry and manufacture Thomas p.139
series of experiments transformed the picture of experimental science Thomas p.140
his biggest impact theoretically, which we are still feeling he worked out an idea which was absolutely right but nobody had though about before then: the nation of the field Thomas p. 140
has given rise to electronics the fax machine, telephone, television they all go back to Faradays understanding they all go back step by step to Faraday Thomas p.141
Faradays ideas inspired his own century and ours p.144
He is a massively important figure. Without Faraday we would not have the kinds of theories which lead on in a variety of ways to rather a large chunk of twentieth-century physics. Iwan Morus p. 144
despite adverts now to the contrary. Faraday did not invent the electric motor the electric light bulb Faraday himself would have been most horrified at the imputation that he was a mere inventor Morus p. 145
rise from poor and intially ill-educated background to be one of the greatest scientists ever p. 145
only those best adapted through sheer good fortune survived p. 160
simply theory many people reject what they think are its awful consequences p. 160
Darwins work has become even more important than it was a hundred years ago p. 160
single best idea anybody ever had.. to Darwin Daniel Dennett p.160
his achievement was tremendous Richard Dawkins p. 161
with hindsight seems enourmously simple Dawkins p. 161
basically spent his years at Cambridge gambling with his healthy friends Stephen Jay Gould p. 162
He abandoned plans made for him first to become a doctor then to be a cleryman p. 163
Perhaps he would have continued in this rather aimless way were it not for an opportunity which he seized p.163
his famous voyage almost failed to happen what a world might have changed there p.163
he had to face a disapproving father p. 163
Darwin was not to be put off p. 164
he took advantage of every opportunity to visit the strange new lands where the ship docked p. 164
Hindsight is a great gift p. 166
In the one short swoop he had gathered everything for a whole lifetime of thought p. 167
had to overcome the fear he was demoting all that they held dear Dennett p. 172
people still do not accept Darwins theory a hundred and fifty years after he first formulated it p. 178
many people are very reluctant to accept the implications of natural selection John Maynard Smith p. 178
They do not like it Smith p. 179
human creativity can all be explained by Darwins theory of natural selection opinion of Darwinists, p. 179
figure of anormous importance p. 188
inspired the arts from computerised pictures to the perculiar sounf of fractal music p. 187
Poincaré single-handedly got at least two major branches of present day mathematics going from almost nothing Ian Stewart p. 191
without topology nowadays, mathematics could not function Stewart p. 191
he invented dynamical systems this was a really radical idea it led to chaos theory Stewart p.191-2
bodies move to all intents and purposes in a way that looks random not really random But it looks as if it has got no structure Stewart p. 194
Chaos is when any deterministic system has a solution that is so complex and so irregular that it appears to be random unless you know a lot of hidden information about what it is doing Stewart p. 194
nobody, including Poincaré, recognised that this was the tip of a huge iceberg of very, very interesting, mathematical questions and answers Stewart p. 195
He has not actually solved the problem but he has created a whole new way of thinking Stewart p. 195
Poincarés work completely alters the way we see the world p. 195
Chaos overturns that simple view of the world some of the simplest rules you can imagine can give you behaviour that is as random and complicated as anything you can imagine Sir Robert May p. 196
applying chaos theory to biological systems p. 196
its sensitivity to minute changes make it very difficult if not impossible to make predictions p. 197
impossible to predict more than somewhere between ten and thirty days ahead because they have chaotic behaviour and the sensitivity to initial conditions makes it impossible p. 198
It is apparently complicated, apparently patternless behaviour that actually has a simple explanation p. 199
simple rules do not have simple consequences May p. 199
the simplest rules you can imagine with nothing random in them, can behave in so complicated a way that they do not have a predictable outcome p. 200
chaos theory, is philosophically and politically liberating Stewart p. 201
Since the French revolution science and scientists have been considered as really important Michael Paty p. 209
I think the controversies have changed over time I think by now a hundred years later, the scandal is different we now have more of a sense of the context Adam Phillips p. 215
Freuds revolutionary theories about the unconscious have influenced every aspect of our lives in the twentieth century p. 216
little to suggest in Freuds background that this would be the case p. 216
he had what was then a traditional, middle-class, Jewish upbringing p. 217
on encounter with Jean Martin Charcot proved to be a turning point in Freuds career p. 217
Freud abandoned neurology, which has always been regarded as a crucial breakpoint in his career p. 223
there is within us a very primal, basic, sensational desire for a sensation which I would call pleasure and he would call sex so simple it does not entail individuality Susan Greenfield p. 226
such a theory remains controversial even today, but it outraged society at the turn of the century p. 229
Throughout his life, despite his steadily growing reputation, Freud had to fight constantly to have his ideas accepted p. 230
This is still a battleground on whether psychoanalysis is scientific p. 232
The feeling of triumph on being liberated is too strongly mixed with sorrow for, in spite of everything, I still greatly loved the prison from which I have been released. The enchantment of the new surroundings is blended with discontent caused by little peculiarities of the strange environment Freud to Max Eitingdon on fleeing Vienna in 1938 p. 235
Freud, who fought so hard to gain the respect of scientists in his day, is now being taken seriously by a group of neuroscientists p. 235
he was a pioneer that thinks originally and has original ideas Susan Greenfield p. 236
Scientists especially tend to forget that they stand on the shoulders of giants. They laugh at people in the past who had misguided views It is so easy to deride seemingly simple-minded ideas of the past Freud nowadays is not popular among neuroscientists Greenfield p. 236
one of just a handful of women studying chemistry p.245
she grew up with this kind of fiestiness and feeling of resisting the status quo Susan Quinn p.246
Paris very much dominated particularly the university by the male authorities where she was definitely in a minority Quinn p.246
no place to go in Poland because university was not open to omen p. 247
really highly unusual behaviour for a young woman of that time Quinn p. 247
She was twenty-three; she was living alone this was just not done. So she was unusual Quinn p. 247
Polish positivism through learning, through science, we can overcome oppression Quinn p. 248
All that I saw and learned that was new delighted me, it was like a new world opened to me, the world of science, which I was at last permitted to know Marie Curie p. 249
One of only two hundred and ten women amongst nine thousand men p. 249
Marie Curies astounding achievements were part of what began to change that rigid and debarring stereotype p. 249
Because a woman must not think and a thinker must not be a woman! Françoise Balibar
he lightened some of her seriousness, helped her to play, to love nature, to have fun Quinn p. 251
She was astounded and did not believe her results at first Quinn p. 254
really opened the door of the nuclear age Quinn p. 254 ? J.J. Thomson, Rutherford
gives us a whole idea of modern versions of radioactivity and eventually atomic fission and so on paved the way for other researchers Dr John Gribbin p. 256
It is by firing particles at unstable atoms that you make the nuclei split apart and you cause fission p. 257
With hindsight you could say that Marie Curie was almost the mother of the atomic bomb p. 257
It was through that beginning that really most of twentieth century physics develops p. 257
They complained a lot about the way in which it changed their life But as a result Pierre was admitted to the Académie des Sciences got funds for their laboratory p. 258
it seemed difficult for anyone at the time to acknowledge her true part in the discovery p. 259
It was a devastating event She stopped working She became depressed Quinn p. 261-2
scientific progress meant a move towards an ever-improving world p.265-6
the Curies work opens the way for nuclear physics It was something that was going to happen if they had not done it Gribbin p. 267
medical side is probably the biggest influence certainly on everyday life in the twentieth century Gribbin p. 267
Marie Curie was a very important scientist Perhaps now we are starting to see a real balance She was a really good scientist, but not of the very first rank Gribbin p. 270
A characteristic of major scientific discovery seems to be that the significance of the work can often change, and radically, as time goes on p. 270
Darwin his work is becoming increasingly important p. 270-1
one of those theories which might not have been arrived at by anyone else Professor Sir Roger Penrose p. 275
Einstein began by rejecting the notion of the ether p. 278
leads on to nuclear power and nuclear bombs Paul Davies p. 280
Einsteins general theory of relativity does not have much impact on our everyday lives, yet it seems to have completely changed the way we look at the universe p. 281
mainly a change in outlook. It is not as though it has directly influenced our lives John Gribbin p. 282
in the first place you will not succeed and, even if you succeed, no one will believe you Max Plank to Einstein p. 282
three attempts at divorcing Mileva, p. 286
Einstein left Germany and the Nazis behind for America p.288
He later urged the United States to develop the atom bomb before Germany p. 288
If I had known they were going to do this, I would have become a shoemaker p. 288
It has undoubtedly got intellectual consequences Jocelyn Bell Burnell p. 289
a completely different way of looking at gravity Penrose p. 292
I cannot believe God plays dice with the universe Gribbin quoting Einstein p. 294
they get old and set in their ways.. they cannot accept new ideas Gribbin p. 294
Physicists seem to be predicting enormous changes in the way we understand the universe p. 295-6
once that theory comes, it will have major implications I think there will be a major revolution coming Penrose p. 296-7
Scientists today are still searching in the same way that Einstein did for answers to the questions that he first posed p. 298
Newton thought h had it all wrapped up and then Einstein came along and showed that was all wrong. Someone will come along and show Einstein is all wrong Paul Davies on other peoples thoughts p. 298
I am sure that in the fullness of time we will find another theory which will incorporate Einsteins theory of relativity I like to believe that out there is the correct theory and that we are moving towards that successive approximations Davies p. 198-9
the greatest scientific even of the twentieth century description by Peter Medawar p. 303
I suspect we will be making a slight dent into the manner in which DNA can reproduce itself. I prefer this type of model over Paulings James Watson to Max Delbrück p. 303
a good candidate for the greatest discovery of the century Richard Dawkins p. 304
Crick and Watson achieved a revolution in biology with their discovery of the double helical structure of DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid), providing the broad answer to the question of how genes replicate and carry information, and effectively beginning the whole new science of molecular biology p. 304
Science its steps forward (and backward) are often very human events in which personalities and cultural traditions play major roles Watson in Double Helix p. 304
Francis Crick was born into a middle-class family he had a stroke of luck p. 305-6
James Watson Early on he wanted to find out what a gene was at the time of the breakthrough, he was still only twenty-five p. 306
It was not until the early years of this century, when Mendels theories were developed and combined with those of the great evolutionist Darwin, that their full significance was grasped p. 306
His work on the structure of biomolecules and on hydrogen bonding formed the basis of Crick and Watsons world of DNA on Pauling p. 307
we were both boat-rockers we never went along for consensus Watson p. 313
Crick and Watsons discovery has revolutionised biology over the last forty-five years In less than half a century, medicine has made great strides forward There have been benefits in other spheres too p. 315
supreme revolution in our view of life Dawkins p. 318
we now understand why acquired character are not inherited p. 319
it is not the knowledge that people are frightened of but what use that knowledge might be put to John Maynard Smith p. 320
I guess yes, but I would hope otherwise. It would change the way people reproduce Watson p. 322
I find it hard to actually think of benefits of cloning p. 323
I guess we were standing on the shoulders of Lawrence Bragg and Linus Pauling Watson p. 324
sciences is an everyday operation performed not by geniuses but by ordinary mortals and punctuated more often by long periods of inactivity than by moments of earth-shattering inspiration p. 325
the moment of conception is often brief Crick p. 325
I just like to know why things happen and I think that is probably something we have inherited. Curiosity about things Watson p. 327
a frontier that will exist for ever, in my opinion, which is to understand the complexities evolved in our universe Sir Martin Rees p. 332
Trying to predict the future is a mugs game John Maynard Smith p. 332
Homo sapiens will never stop seeking to find out what he does not know p. 333
Our subjects stand on the shoulders of giants before them p.333
Where once most people looked to faith for comfort, today many optimistically expect the next generation of scientists to add to the knowledge we already have and improve on it. They have faith that the future will only be better. That is only one view p. 333
No brilliant insight has gone unchallenged p. 333-4
science will continue, but its glory days are over John Horgan p. 335
one can equally argue that science is just the beginning Sir John Maddox p. 335
A century ago was one of the great triumphalist periods in science it seemed that science was set for contentment But look what happened. Within five years the subject of physics had been turned upside down there has been such a revolutionary period in science Maddox p. 337
the origins of the marvellous revolution that we had at the beginning of this century were to be found in the contentment of the nineteenth century p. 338
argument among scientist about whether there is anything left to discover in science gap in knowledge is about the human mind, how it works maybe more philosophical than scientific
Igor Aleksander is optimistic that forty years from now we will have artificially conscious machines. I am not sure I welcome that moment p. 351
Theory of Everything p. 355
it was easier in the old days for people to seem giants because the universe was so badly known and explored p. 357-8
Scientists seek truth through knowledge and progress comes through success in this marvellous enterprise p. 360