[
News ]
My System:
First i tried the standard
4x66 at 2.1v. It ran perfectly, but couldn't
satisfy my appetite for speed
in Unreal. Then
i went on to 4.5x66 at 2.1v. Amazingly it ran rock solid. This
is my standard
setting now.
If you are interested in more details, I will be glad to give you more information to contribute to your page - It is the main reason that now I have pentium2-like performance and saved at least half my money. By the way, please excuse my terrible language - i am a german who knows english only from surfing the internet and playing silly computer games. See you Alexander"
An interesting Windows 98 FAQ page has popped up on FIC's Taiwan web site answering one important question. Why does my VIA chipset-based motherboard crash under Windows98? This problem is caused
by incorrect assignment of IRQ by Microsoft Windows98. MiniPort driver
released by VIA reassigns these IRQs. The driver has not been released
by FIC yet but it can be found on the FIC FTP
server.
I also have a brief report from one daring pioneer venturing to try the 5.5x multiplier with his K6 266 processor:
A big thank you to all those people who have sent to me information regarding the 5.5x clock multiplier and PC100 SDRAM. I need more info so put on your lab coats and e-mail me the results. PC100 SDRAM
FIC denies it exists! There has been much debate at the alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.fic news group. Yes, an undocumented ICW clock generator multiplier setting of 5.5x? Is it fact or fiction? The PA-2011 (FIC's ATX version of the PA-2007 motherboard) uses the same ICW clock generator and has a 5.5x multiplier setting. Here are the settings:
Can anyone confirm its existence? PC100 SDRAM is pure
overkill for your PA-2007 motherboard but it will be a requirement for
your next motherboard. I have planned to upgrade the memory in my
system and go for PC100 SDRAM to try and future proof my investment.
Now, in the future when I move up to a Super Socket 7 board I will already
have the necessary PC100 SDRAM. Currently I have no information on
which PC100 SDRAM works with the PA-2007. Can anyone make any
recommendations or have any experiences?
I think it is safe to say that all currently available drives, with either the IDE or SCSI interface, are S.M.A.R.T. capable. As promised I visited the hard disk manufacturers sites to compile a list of all S.M.A.R.T. drives and found most if not all disks are S.M.A.R.T. capable with very few exceptions. I have received a reponse from FIC regarding the BIOS S.M.A.R.T. capability:
'You can get answer in this page.
I guess I will read this
page again to find out how to use the S.M.A.R.T. feature.
Those of us who have updated our BIOS from version 109cx12 to any of the new 113cx1x BIOS have noticed a new setting, S.M.A.R.T. Self-Monitoring Analysis and Reporting Technology. It is a hard disk drive reliability prediction technology pioneered by Compaq and supported by all the top hard disk manufacturers. I'm not sure how it is used on the PA-2007 but I can speculate that possibly the BIOS gives the user a warning when a S.M.A.R.T. hard disk starts to fail. Or on the other hand, maybe the BIOS just enables/disables S.M.A.R.T. support for the S.M.A.R.T. hard disk drives. Then it would be up to the Operating System or an application running to monitor the hard disk status and warn the user of pending failures. I am searching for a list of S.M.A.R.T. enabled hard disks and I will let you know what I find. I know FIC
Technical Support could shed some light on the subject. I will
post their response.
The new flash program from FIC, FLASH560.EXE, has a really handy feature for verifying BIOS files. When the FLASH560 program reads in the BIOS file, it displays the files checksum. What is so important about the BIOS files checksum? The files checksum is the sum (addition) of all the 1's and 0's in the file. Therefore every BIOS file has a unique checksum. When you download a BIOS file you can verify that the checksum is the correct value for that BIOS version. A corrupted BIOS file will return an incorrect value for the checksum. I have put together a table of PA-2007 BIOS files and their checksums.
Now you can avoid flashing a corrupted BIOS file by using the FLASH560 program to check them against the table above.
Cool more benchmarks for the K6-2 sent to us from Frank T. Mars. Can anyone else confirm 75MHz operation with beta BIOS 113cd135?
Win Bench98 K6-2 266 o/c 300mhz
68.5mhz 4.5x 2.3v 75mhz
4.x 2.3v
Now it seems FIC did not
lock bios @ 66-68.5
Regards
Check out the e-mail I received from Jens Carl who against all odds has a PA-2007 with release BIOS 113cd13 running the K6-2 300 at 2.1V. Jens has also included Wintune98 benchmarks.
I don't have this rebooting problem. My System: FIC PA2007 Rev.1.2 Bios 113CD13 10ns 64 Mb SDRAM Elsa Victory Erazor video card Symbios Logic 8150S SCSI Controller IBM DCAS 34330U Teac CD-516S MOD Fujitsu 2513A2 Soundblaster AWE64 Value Elsa Microlink 28.8 TQV modem Here are some Wintune98 results:
This weekend I will try it
with 333MHz. I will send you a message if it runs fine.
I have sent the beta BIOS,
113cd135, out and hope to hear from some more happy K6-2 owners.
The BIOS was posted to me by Mike Rains.
Hot news. I have a new beta BIOS, 113cd135, which has solved K6-2 looping reboot problem for Frank T. Mars. Thanks goes to Frank for testing this BIOS. E-mail me if you have this problem and I can send you the BIOS file. I have updated the PA-2007 FAQ in response to information you requested. I have yet to start on the
BIOS flashing report. ETA unknown at this stage. Do you have any
suggestions for the BIOS report?
Please forgive me as I do not have time to post a full commentary. Thanks goes to Frank T. Mars for forwarding this note to me. Look below for FIC's reply to the PA-2007 & K6-2 looping reboot problem: Subject: PA2007 and k6-2 bios Author: <RMars15669@aol.com> at internet-mail Date: 1998/6/18 08:59 AM Dear Sir
Date: 6/18/98 10:58:41 PM Eastern Daylight Time From: Tech_Support_at_FIC-R&D@ccgtwy.fic.com.tw (Tech Support) To: RMars15669@AOL.COM Thank you for contacting FIC technical support. Please include your case number when you reply. The limitation is not on Clock generator(ICW W48c67 which may support 75 Mhz), it is from bios, 113Cx.13, it only support system clock at 66Mhz, in order to support 128MB sdram and AMD k6-2 266&300, we release it to meet customer's demand. We appreciate your report on bios warm boot problem, I'm afraid there will no more bios release for PA-2007 any more, however we will prevent this bug on our current mass production board. Sincerely your, Tech Support
Wonderful news FIC have posted an official release BIOS update for the PA-2007 motherboard adding support for the AMD K6-2 3D and the Cyrix MII processors. There are two versions of the BIOS, the 113cd13 is for PA-2007 with VIA 586A and the 113cn13 is for PA-2007 with VIA 586B. I intend to do some flashing this weekend and post a detailed report. Since flashing to the new BIOS (113cd13) my initial tests show no significant changes in performance. There is some bad news with
this update. I still have a report of the looping reboot problem
stills persisting even after the new 113cd13 update.
BTW, the FIC gods are watching over the PA-2007 Technical Reference site. It seems they have updated the FIC PA-2007 FAQ on the Taiwan site with a link to my innovative user front page. Cool, hah? I pray to the gods for continued
PA-2007 motherboard support, an FIC approved re-engineering core
voltage kit (included one 100K ohm resistor = 2.2V), and definitely
continue producing kick-ass products!
Furthermore, it seems
flashing back to 109cd12 fixes the problem. Ah, it seems to
be a BIOS problem. Those of you with this problem have you tried
the more recent beta BIOS 113cd15? I will keep you all updated.
I have added a link pointing to the alt.comp.periph.mainboard.fic news group below in the Content Highlights section. Click on the link to use the dejanews site. Eventually I think I will get rid of the Help Wanted page and point you to the News Group where you can post your problems. In the news group the problem will get more exposure. So today before you leave
this site check out the discussions.
Hi everyone the site is up again. Sorry about the delays.
The beta BIOS does report the K6-2 processors as K6-2-266 or K6-2-300. This can only confirm that the BIOS supports ALL currently available AMD K6 processors. I have posted a PA-2007 & K6-3D report from 'smoker'. Check it out.
I have received a number of e-mails from individuals asking for help and advise. That's great, I'm glad this site is generating renewed interest in the PA-2007 motherboard. As best as I can I have been replying to those questions but unfortunately there are also many I can't find answers to. This is the reason I think this site can help us find solutions to these problems. In the future when you e-mail a problem, put Help Wanted, in the subject line. If you agree I will post the e-mail along with a link to your e-mail address on the Help Wanted page. The whole idea is if enough people read your posts then e-mail you there is a better chance of finding the answer! Keep e-mailing me as I enjoy the your comments and feedback.
Great news I have found someone who is running a K6-2 on a PA-2007. Read the following post: I am curious to know more
details. What speed and cpu exactly does the beta 113cd133 BIOS report?
I guess we must give Smoker and his son some time to test the combination.
How rock solid is it?
The voltage settings I discovered were tested and proven and then confirmed by FIC Technical Support but please note they do not endorse it. I will explain how the 100K resistor jumpered at VR position 11-12 on the PA-2007 motherboard gives you 2.2V. FIC has confirmed the following resistors values that determine the core voltage settings on a revision 1.2 board:
Hi to all my visitors and thank you for all your support. I want to tell you that I'm not ready to buy a 100MHz super socket 7 motherboard. Not enough choices and the technology is not mature just yet plus my PA-2007 has plenty of life left. I want the K6-2 with 3DNow! and later buy a super socket 7 motherboard to replace the PA-2007. I think the 266MHz (o/c to 337 or 375) will work great on the PA-2007. A perfect gaming platform. Add to that more memory and one of them 3D accelerator cards and whoosh your away. I have sent an e-mail to FIC technical support and hope to get a reply soon on the subject of the PA-2007 and K6-2 3DNow! processors. Please help me lobby FIC for continued BIOS support. Take 5 minutes now, to write FIC and request support for the latest K6 cpus.
The PA-2007 beta BIOS 113cd133 is available to add support for both large SDRAM 64MB and 128MB memory modules as well as AMD's new 0.25 micron processors, the K6-266 and K6-300. The 113cd133 BIOS now recognises the K6-266/300 cpus reporting them correctly and the memory write speed problems the K6-266/300 had with the previous release BIOS version 109cd12 has been fixed. I don't know if the new K6-2 with 3DNow! is supported by the beta BIOS. The newest BIOS file I have for the PA-2007 motherboard is beta BIOS version 113cd15. I have not used this flash file on my board yet but WindWalker author of the PC Hardware Blue Book site has and reported a small performance improvement with his system but his BIOS still displays BIOS version 113cd133. Go figure. What does it mean? FIC have posted new memory
support documentation for the PA-2007. It documents the 64 MB and
128 MB tested with beta BIOS revision 113cd133. The report is available
on Your Page.
I have added a new page, 'Your Page', devoted to the valuable information I get from your e-mails and the information I find in newsgroups. So enjoy!
Birth of the PA-2007 Technical Reference site. Posted the PA-2007 How-to-guide for core voltages. Go ahead and read this guide and find out how to set core voltages starting from 2.1V through to 3.3V in 0.1V increments. *Important Note* - the How-to-guide for core voltages can only be used by owners of revision 1.2 motherboards. It seems the board revisions prior to 1.2 did not have the 2.1V setting (VR jumper positions 11-12) which is so important to achieving 2.2V with the 100K resistor. Sorry to the owners of the
PA-2012 motherboard. I do not have a PA-2012 motherboard which I
can do my core voltage testing with. Therefore I cannot help you
with a 2.2V setting.
|